Samsung Canada
Consumers need as many forums to share their customer service complaints as
possible and the addition to others such as Ellen Roseman’s at the Star can
only help get the word out about Companies that appear more concerned about
the bottom dollar than ensuring their products last a reasonable time, or
address known defects and issues with consumers interests at heart.
I offer the example of Samsung Canada‘s refusal to support owners
experiencing a KNOWN issue (on/off clicking at power up, created by faulty
capacitors including #CM852 & CM853, and possibly others on the power supply
board) by repairing the defective units.
Initially Samsung denied the existence of the problem or indicated “We have
confirmed with our Quality Control department that the model you own does
not exhibit any widespread issues that may cause concerns.” Denying it
became more difficult when faced with the evidence of numerous internet
reports by owners and when I noted one of their own Samsung repair techs
started a forum discussion on CNET and initiated a 50 customer investigation
in September 2009 to determine why the capacitors are failing in a variety
of Samsung LCD Tv models, often shortly after warranty expiry.
http://forums.cnet.com/5208-13973_102-0.html?threadID=357687
Some owners have been successful in getting Samsung to repair the problem
but in Canada, the Office of the President’s rep Ahmed Yahiouche states “Our
decision will stand,” in response to a request that his superior review the
claim since based on how he handled the claim, it appears he didn’t bother
reading the claim to learn we were out of warranty when we initiated it, yet
he proceeded to request information to consider the claim, and then denied
it ‘due to the expiry of your limited warranty’.
His office has been provided the links to the CNET Samsung Tech’s thread,
where it is acknowledged a widespread problem with Samsung TV’s exists.
Ripoffreports where another owner received a similar cut and paste
response from him months earlier, and other forums discussing the on/off
issue.
Samsung has failed to acknowledge there is an implied product warranty and a
reasonable expectation that their products last more than a few months
beyond the 1 year warranty…or perhaps Samsung does only expect their
product to last just beyond the one year manufacturer warranty and owners
are unreasonable in their expectation?
All imo (in my opinion).
Disclaimer
This article was submitted by one of our readers. Penciltrick cannot make any claims as to its authenticity but the article was accepted on a good faith belief that it is an accurate and truthful account of the events listed.


